Pump.fun Acknowledges Creator Fee Mechanism "Incentive Distortion," Plans Comprehensive Adjustment
BlockBeats News, January 10th, Pump.fun announced that it will restructure the creator fee mechanism. Its co-creator Alon Cohen stated on the X platform that the current Dynamic Fees V1, while significantly increasing platform activity in the short term, may have "distorted the incentive structure" in the long term, failing to establish sustainable market behavior.
Cohen pointed out that the mechanism encourages low-risk large-scale token issuance but suppresses high-risk transaction activity crucial to the platform. "Traders are the core source of platform liquidity and trading volume, and this structure is dangerous," he said.
Looking back, he said that the initial effect of the mechanism was significant, with a large influx of new creators driving engagement through live streaming, among other methods. Pump.fun's bonding curve trading volume doubled within weeks, creating one of the most vibrant on-chain ecosystems since early 2025. However, the hype quickly subsided, revealing structural issues.
As a first-stage adjustment, Pump.fun will introduce a creator fee splitting mechanism, allowing creators or Community Take Over (CTO) administrators to proportionally distribute fees to up to 10 wallets after the token goes live. It also supports transferring token ownership and revoking update permissions. Cohen emphasized that Pump.fun team members will not take any creator fees under any circumstances. This feature is "entirely for frontline players," and fees can be claimed at any time without expiration.
You may also like

Ten Thousand Words Interpretation of STRC: Strategy for Making Money to Buy Coins New Magic

What competitive advantages are still defensible in the AI era?

For Whom the Bell Tolls, For Whom the Lobster Feeds? A Dark Forest Survival Guide for the 2026 Agent Player

Circle CEO's Latest Interview: Stablecoins Are Not Cryptocurrency

Deconstructing the Public Chain Pharos Capital Game: Is a $950 million valuation supported by assets like photovoltaics just a shell transaction under layers of betting?

a16z: AI is making everyone 10x more productive, but the true winner has yet to emerge

Why did the star Web3 project Across Protocol choose to abandon DAO?

In fact, ETH scaling is a major benefit for L2

Memories: 10 Key Contributions of the TON Core Team That Few People Knew in the Early Days

2025 South Korea CEX Listing Post-Mortem: Investing in New Coins = 70% Loss?

BIP-360 Analysis: Bitcoin's First Step Towards Quantum Immunity, But Why Only the "First Step"?

50 million USDT exchanged for 35,000 USD AAVE: How did the disaster happen? Who should we blame?

The Cryptographic Past of the Middle East

Resolving the Intergenerational Prisoner's Dilemma: The Inevitable Path of Nomadic Capital Bitcoin

Who Will Control AI? Why Decentralized AI May Be the Only Alternative to Government and Big Tech
AI has become critical infrastructure, and governments and corporations are competing to control it. Centralized development and regulation are entrenching existing power structures. The Web3 community is building a decentralized alternative — distributed compute, token incentives, and community governance — before that window closes.

Vitalik wrote a proposal teaching you how to secretly use AI large models

On the eve of the explosion of on-chain options

WEEX AI Hackathon: How Did This AI Trading Winner Succeed?
A self-taught AI trading enthusiast achieved top-10 results at the WEEX AI Hackathon. Learn about the mindset, AI tools, and lessons behind this impressive performance.