Arthur Hayes: Making ICOs Great Again

By: blockbeats|2024/12/03 08:15:01
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: The Cure
Original Article Author: Arthur Hayes
Original Article Translation: Ismay, BlockBeats

Editor's Note:
In this article, Arthur Hayes offers a sharp analysis of the rise and fall of ICOs in the cryptocurrency industry, presenting insights into why ICOs could return to the peak. He points out profoundly that over-reliance on centralized exchanges and venture capital-backed overvalued projects has become a shackle on the industry's development. He compares Meme coins to the capital formation mechanism of ICOs, advocating for crypto projects to return to their roots of decentralization and high-risk high-return. Through an interpretation of technological potential and viral spread, Arthur Hayes once again demonstrates his foresight on the industry's future development.

Below is the original content:

Tension and pressure can sometimes infect individuals, leading to irrational behavior. Unfortunately, many companies in the Maelstrom portfolio have contracted the "Centralized Exchange Spread Disease (CEXually Transmitted Disease)." The affected founders believe they must fully obey certain prominent centralized exchanges' orders, or else the path to substantial returns will be blocked. These centralized exchanges demand: pump up this metric, hire this person, allocate me this portion of tokens, list your token on this date... and so on, well, just follow our instructions for the listing. These "patients" addicted to exchange platform desires have almost completely forgotten the original intention of users and cryptocurrency. Come to my clinic, and I can cure you. The remedy is ICO. Let me explain...

I have a three-point theory on why cryptocurrency has become one of the fastest-growing networks in human history:

Government Capture

Big corporations, big tech, big pharma, big defense, and other "big XX" have used their wealth and power to control most major governments and economies. Since the end of World War II, despite a rapid and consistent improvement in living standards and life expectancy, this improvement has slowed down for the 90% of the population with very little financial assets and almost no political voice. Decentralization is the antidote to combating highly concentrated wealth and power.

The Magical Technology

The Bitcoin blockchain and the many blockchains that followed are groundbreaking magical technologies. Starting from humble beginnings, Bitcoin has already proven itself to be one of the most resilient monetary systems. For anyone able to breach the Bitcoin network, the nearly $2 trillion in Bitcoin is a bug bounty of immense double-spending potential.

Greed

The blockchain-driven cryptocurrency and token's fiat and energy value growth have made users wealthy. The wealth of the cryptocurrency community was on full display during the November U.S. election. The U.S. (and most other countries) is a "pay-to-play" political system. The "pirates" of cryptocurrency are among the biggest donors to political candidates, aiding cryptocurrency-friendly candidates to victory. Cryptocurrency voters are able to donate generously in political campaigns because Bitcoin is the fastest-growing asset in human history.

Capital Formation Amnesia

Most cryptocurrency participants instinctively understand why this industry has been successful; however, there are occasional bouts of amnesia. This phenomenon is reflected in the changes in cryptocurrency capital formation. At times, those seeking cryptocurrency capital have catered to the community's greed and achieved tremendous success. At other times, cash-strapped founders forget why users flocked to cryptocurrency. Yes, they may believe in a government of "by the people, for the people," or they may create stunning technology, but if users cannot get rich from it, the adoption of any cryptocurrency-related product or service will be too slow.

Since the end of the 2017 ICO frenzy, capital formation has become less pure, deviating from the path of community greed stimulation. Instead, we have seen high Fully Diluted Valuations (FDVs), low circulating supplies, or VC-backed tokens. However, VC-backed tokens have performed poorly in this current bull cycle (2023–present). In my article "PvP," I highlighted that the median performance of tokens issued in 2024 was about 50% lower compared to mainstream assets (Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana). Retail investors ultimately baulked at buying into these projects when they were listed on centralized exchanges (CEX) due to high prices. As a result, the exchange's internal market-making team, airdrop recipients, and third-party market makers dumped the token onto illiquid markets, resulting in disastrous performance.

Why has our entire industry forgotten the third pillar of cryptocurrency's value proposition... making retail investors "filthy rich"?

The Antidote to Meme Coins

The new issuance market of cryptocurrency has turned into the very thing it was supposed to replace—an interest chain system similar to an Initial Public Offering (IPO) in traditional finance (TradFi). In this system, retail investors end up being the bagholders of VC-backed tokens. However, in the crypto space, there is always an alternative. Meme coins are a class of tokens that serve no purpose other than virally spreading meme content on the internet. If the meme is popular enough, you buy into it, hoping someone else will take the baton later. The capital formation of meme coins is egalitarian. The team releases the entire supply upfront during issuance, and the initial fully diluted valuation (FDV) is usually only in the millions. By launching on decentralized exchanges (DEX), speculators engage in highly risky bets, gambling on which meme can tap into the industry's collective consciousness, thus creating buying demand for the token.

From a retail speculator's standpoint, the most enticing aspect of meme coins is that if you get in early, you might leap several rungs on the wealth ladder. However, every participant is aware that the meme coin they buy has no intrinsic value, generates no cash flows, and therefore, is fundamentally worthless. Hence, they fully embrace the risk of potentially losing all their funds in pursuit of financial dreams. Most importantly, there are no gatekeepers telling them whether they can buy a particular meme coin, and there are no shadowy capital pools waiting to dump the newly unlocked supply when the price rises high enough.

I want to establish a simple taxonomy to understand different types of tokens and why they hold value. Let's start with meme coins.

Meme Coin's Intrinsic Value = Virality of Meme Content

This concept is very intuitive. As long as you are an active participant in any online or offline community, you can grasp the significance of memes.

If this is what a meme coin is, then what is a VC token?

The Essence of VC Tokens and the Culture of Traditional Finance

Adherents of traditional finance (TradFi) don't actually possess real skills. I can attest to this from my own experience reflecting on my time in investment banking, where the required skills were meager, to say the least—a summary would be: almost none. Many people want to get into traditional finance because you can make a lot of money without needing substantial knowledge. Just give me someone who knows a bit of high school algebra and has a good work ethic, and I can train them to do any front-office financial services job. This is unlike professions such as doctors, lawyers, plumbers, electricians, mechanical engineers, and others. Entering these occupations requires time and skills, yet the average income often falls below that of a junior investment banker, salesperson, or trader. The wasted intellectual resources in the financial services industry are disheartening, but I and others are just responding to societal incentives.

Since traditional finance is a low-skill but high-income industry, the barrier to entry into this exclusive club often relies on other social factors. Your family background and the university or boarding school you attended are more important than your actual intelligence. In traditional finance, stereotypes based on race and social class have a more significant influence than in other professions. Once you are inducted into this unique circle, you perpetuate these norms to give more value to traits you have acquired or not acquired. For example, if you work hard and incur significant debt to attend a top university, you would tend to hire people from the same university as you believe it's the best choice. Failing to do so would mean admitting that the time and effort you put into obtaining those qualifications were not worth it. In psychology, this is known as "Effort Justification Bias."

Let's use this framework to understand how venture capital (VC) novices raise funds and allocate resources.

To raise enough capital to invest in a sufficient number of companies to find a winner (e.g., Facebook, Google, Tencent, ByteDance, etc.), top venture capital firms require a significant amount of capital. This funding mainly comes from endowments, pension funds, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, and family offices. These pools of capital are mostly managed by traditional finance (TradFi) professionals. These managers must fulfill fiduciary responsibilities to their clients and can only invest in "suitable" venture capital funds. This means they mostly have to invest in venture capital funds managed by "qualified" and "experienced" professionals.

These subjective requirements have led to a phenomenon where these venture partners typically graduate from that tiny fraction of elite universities globally (such as Harvard, Oxford, Peking University, etc.), and their careers usually start at large investment banks (e.g., JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs), asset management firms (e.g., BlackRock, Fidelity), or major tech companies (e.g., Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Tencent, etc.). If you do not have such a background, gatekeepers of traditional finance job requirements would consider you lacking the necessary experience and qualifications to manage other people's funds. As a result, this circle forms a highly homogeneous group—they look alike, speak alike, dress alike, and even live in the same global elite communities.

For managers who need to allocate funds to venture funds, the dilemma is: if they take the risk of investing in a fund managed by non-traditional-background individuals and it fails, they may lose their jobs. But if they choose the safe route and allocate funds to funds managed by "suitable and proper" individuals, even if the fund fails, they can attribute it to bad luck, thus preserving their position in the asset management industry. If you fail alone, you lose your job; but if you fail together with others, your job is usually not affected. As the primary goal of traditional finance professionals is to keep their well-paid yet low-tech jobs, they mitigate career risk by selecting seemingly "appropriate" background managers to ensure their own security.

If the selection criteria for venture capital funds is to see if the managing partner fits a certain accepted stereotype, then these managers will also only invest in companies or projects whose founders fit the "founder" stereotype. For business-oriented founders, their resume must include work experience at a major consulting firm or investment bank, and it is expected that they have studied at specific global elite universities. On the other hand, technical founders are required to have experience working at highly successful large tech companies and hold advanced degrees from universities known to produce top engineers. Lastly, due to human social tendencies, we tend to prefer investing in people we are more closely related to. Therefore, Silicon Valley VCs only invest in companies located in the Bay Area, while Chinese VCs hope to invest in companies headquartered in Beijing or Shenzhen.

The result is the creation of an echo chamber-like homogenized environment. Everyone looks, talks, thinks, believes, and lives in similar ways. As a result, everyone either succeeds together or fails together. This environment happens to be the ideal state for traditional financial VC professionals, as their goal is to minimize professional risk.

After the ICO boom bubble burst, when crypto project founders were scrambling to raise VC funding, they were essentially making a deal with the "devil." To obtain funding from VCs primarily based in San Francisco, New York, London, and Beijing, crypto project founders had to make changes.

Venture Capital Token Intrinsic Value = Founder's educational background, employment history, family background, geographic location

Venture capitalists first value the team and only then the product. If the founder fits the stereotype, funding will continuously flow in. Because these founders inherently possess the "correct" background, a small fraction of teams will find the product-market fit after spending billions of dollars, giving rise to the next Ethereum. Since most teams will ultimately fail, VC allocators' decision-making logic remains unquestioned since the founders they support are all recognized as the type likely to succeed.

It is obvious that when selecting investment teams, cryptocurrency expertise is only a distant consideration after the fact. This is the beginning of the disconnect between venture capitalists and retail investors. The primary goal of VC newcomers is to keep their jobs, while regular retail investors hope to turn their fortunes around by buying coins that skyrocket thousands of times. Thousandfold returns were once possible. If you bought ETH for about $0.33 during the Ethereum presale, you would have realized a 9000x return at current prices. However, the current mechanism of crypto capital formation has made such returns nearly impossible.

Venture investors make money by trading illiquid, crappy SAFTs (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens) between funds, with each trade inflating the valuation. When these deeply flawed crypto projects eventually land on centralized exchanges (CEX) for their initial listings, their fully diluted valuation (FDV) often exceeds $1 billion. To achieve thousandfold returns, FDV needs to grow to an extremely exaggerated number—one that even exceeds the total value of all fiat-denominated assets... and this is just for one project. This is also why retail investors are more willing to gamble on a $1 million market cap meme coin rather than a project supported by the "most respected" VC group with an FDV of over $1 billion. The behavior of retail investors actually aligns with the logic of maximizing expected returns.

If retail investors have already started rejecting the venture capital token model, then what makes ICO fundamentally more appealing?

ICO Intrinsic Value = Virality of the Narrative + Potential Technology

Meme:

A project team that can launch a product in line with the current cryptocurrency trend, combining visuals, user experience, and a clear goal, possesses "meme value." When this "meme" is attractive and spreads, the project gains attention. The goal of the project is to attract users at the lowest possible cost and then sell them products or services. A project that resonates with people can quickly bring users to the top of its growth funnel.

Potential Technology:

In the early stages of a project's lifecycle, an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) usually takes place. Ethereum, for example, raised funds before developing a product. In this model, community trust in the project team is implicit, believing that as long as they provide financial support, they can create a valuable product. Therefore, potential technology can be evaluated in the following ways:

1. Has the team previously developed meaningful products in the Web2 or Web3 space?

2. Is the technology the team plans to develop technically feasible?

3. Can this potential technology solve a globally significant problem, ultimately attracting hundreds of millions or even billions of users?

Technology founders who meet the above criteria may not necessarily be the same type of people that venture capital firms would invest in as "elites." The cryptocurrency community is not so concerned about family background, past career experiences, or specific educational qualifications. While these criteria may be a plus, they are meaningless if they have not enabled the founding team to deliver excellent code before. The community is more inclined to support someone like Andre Cronje rather than a former Google employee who graduated from Stanford and holds a membership in the Battery Club.

Although most ICOs (99.99%) almost go to zero after a cycle, a few teams are still able to develop user-attractive technology based on their "meme effect." Early investors in these ICOs have the opportunity to achieve returns of 1,000 times or even 10,000 times. This is the game they want to play. The speculative and volatile nature of ICOs is a feature, not a flaw. If retail investors want a safe, boring investment, they can choose traditional global financial stock trading platforms. In most jurisdictions, Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) require companies to be profitable, and management also needs to make various statements to assure the public that they will not deceive. However, for ordinary retail investors, the issue with IPOs is that they cannot bring a life-changing return, as venture capitalists have already divided the spoils in the early stages.

If ICOs clearly have the potential to fund technologies with viral meme propagation and potential global impact, how do we make them "great again"?

ICO Roadmap

At its purest form, an ICO allows any team with an internet connection to showcase its project to the crypto community and receive funding. The team would launch a website detailing team members, the product or service planned for development, why they are qualified, and why the market needs their product or service. Subsequently, investors—or should we say "speculators"—can send cryptocurrency to an on-chain address and receive distributed tokens after a certain period. Various aspects of the ICO, such as the timeline, fundraising amount, token price, development technology type, team composition, and investor demographics, are entirely decided by the ICO team themselves, not by any gatekeepers (such as VC funds or centralized exchanges). This is precisely why centralized intermediaries loathe ICOs—because they are fundamentally unnecessary. However, the community loves ICOs because they provide a diversity of projects initiated by people from various backgrounds, offering those willing to take on high risk an opportunity for potentially high returns.

ICOs are making a comeback as the entire industry has gone through a full circle. We once enjoyed freedom but got burned in the process; then we felt the oppression of VC and centralized exchange (CEX) dominion, detesting their forcefully marketed overvalued junk projects. Now, in a nascent bull market driven by massive money printing by the US, China, Japan, and the EU, cryptocurrency market speculators are engrossed in meaningless meme coin speculative trading, and the community is once again ready to fully engage in high-risk ICO trading. It is now the time for "near-solvent" crypto speculators to cast a wide net of capital, hoping to capture the next Ethereum opportunity.

The question now is: What will be different this time?

Timeline:

Today, through frameworks like Pump.fun, token launches can be completed in just minutes, coupled with higher liquidity decentralized exchanges (DEXs), allowing teams to raise funds through ICOs and deliver tokens in a matter of days. This is starkly different from the previous ICO cycle, where the process from subscription to token delivery could take months or even years. Now, investors can immediately trade newly issued tokens on platforms like Uniswap or Raydium.

Thanks to Maelstrom's investment in the Oyl wallet, we had the privilege of previewing some potentially game-changing smart contract technology built on the Bitcoin blockchain. Alkanes is a brand new meta-protocol designed to introduce smart contracts to Bitcoin using the UTXO model. I don't fully understand how it works, but I hope those smarter and more skilled than me can review their GitHub codebase and decide whether it's worth building on. I'm very excited for Alkanes to drive explosive growth in ICO issuance within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Liquidity:

Due to retail crypto speculators' infatuation with meme coins, they eagerly seek to trade highly speculative assets on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). This means that, post-token delivery to investors, unvetted project ICO tokens can immediately be traded, enabling true price discovery.

While I may not personally favor Solana, I have to admit that Pump.fun has indeed had a positive impact on the industry, as the protocol allows non-technical users to create their own meme coins in minutes and start trading. Continuing this trend of democratizing finance and crypto trading, Maelstrom has invested in a project aiming to be the go-to platform for meme coins, all cryptocurrencies, and new ICO issuances for spot trading.

Spot.dog is building a meme coin trading platform to attract Web2 users onboard. Their "ace up the sleeve" lies not in technology but in distribution channels. Current meme coin trading platforms are mostly designed for crypto traders. For instance, Pump.fun requires users to have a certain level of knowledge about Solana wallets, token swaps, slippage, and more. However, everyday users who follow Barstool Sports, subscribe to r/wsb, trade stocks on Robinhood, and bet on their favorite teams through DraftKings would opt to trade on Spot.dog.

From the outset, Spot.dog has secured some impressive partnerships. For instance, the "cryptocurrency purchase button" on the social trading platform Stocktwits (with 1.2 million monthly active users) is supported by Spot.dog. Additionally, the **$MOTHER Telegram trading bot** of Iggy Azalea has one sole partner — yes, Spot.dog.

I bet you speculators are eager to know when their token will be launched, right? Don't worry, when the time is right, if you're interested in going all-in on Spot.dog's governance token, I'll let you know when!

UI/UX:

The crypto community is already very familiar with non-custodial browser wallets like Metamask and Phantom. Crypto investors are accustomed to loading their crypto browser wallets, connecting them to dApps, and then purchasing assets. This user behavior will make ICO fundraising much easier.

Blockchain Scalability:

In 2017, popular ICOs often led to Ethereum network congestion. Gas fees skyrocketed, and regular users couldn't use the network at a reasonable cost. By 2025, block space costs on Ethereum, Solana, Aptos, and other Layer-1 blockchains will be very low. The current order of processing capacity has increased several orders of magnitude compared to 2017. If a team can attract a large number of fervent "degen" speculator supporters, their fundraising capabilities will no longer be limited by slow and expensive blockchains.

Due to the extremely low cost per transaction of Aptos, it has the opportunity to become the preferred blockchain platform for ICOs.

Average Transaction Fee per Transaction (USD):

• Aptos: $0.0016
• Solana: $0.05

• Ethereum: $5.22

The Necessity of Saying No

I proposed a solution to the "Centralized Exchange (CEX)-related disease" — ICO. However, now project teams need to make the right choice. To ensure they understand this, ordinary crypto investors need to firmly say no.

Say no to the following:

• Projects supported by venture capital, with high FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) and low circulation

• Tokens that have high valuations on centralized exchanges at their initial listing

• People advocating so-called "irrational" trading behavior

Indeed, there were many obvious "junk projects" in the 2017 ICO craze. Among them, the most disruptive ICO was EOS. Block.one raised $4.1 billion in cryptocurrency to build EOS, but after EOS launched, it almost vanished. Actually, this statement isn't entirely accurate — EOS's market cap is still as high as $12 billion. This shows that even a "junk project" like EOS issued during the peak of the bubble still retains significant value. As someone who loves the financial markets, I must admit that the design and execution of the EOS ICO could be considered an "art." Project founders should delve into how Block.one managed to raise the most funds in history through an ICO or token sale.

I mention these to illustrate the risk-adjusted investment logic: if investment allocations are correct, even projects that should have gone to zero may still hold some value post-ICO. Investing early in ICOs was the only way to achieve a 10,000x return, but there is no heavenly reward without hellish risk. To pursue a 10,000x return, you must accept that the majority of your investment's value post-ICO may be close to zero. However, this is much better than the current venture capital token model. Nowadays, achieving a 10,000x return in venture capital tokens is nearly impossible, but a 75% loss a month after listing on a CEX is all too common. Ordinary investors subconsciously realize the poor risk-return ratio of venture capital tokens, hence turning to memecoins. Let's once again create enthusiastic support for new projects through ICOs, giving investors the possibility of massive wealth accumulation and restoring ICOs to their former glory!

Original Article Link

You may also like

MYX Case Analysis: The Complete Harvesting Tactics Behind the Fake Surge of Cryptocurrency Tokens

MYX Case Analysis: The Complete Harvesting Tactics Behind the Fake Surge of Cryptocurrency Tokens

Gate founder Dr. Han: The crypto winter drives structural reshaping, and everything on-chain will become a new paradigm in finance

Gate CEO Dr. Han appeared at the Hong Kong Web3 Carnival, emphasizing that "everything will be on-chain" will reshape the future of finance, and announced the acceleration of building an integrated trading hub that connects crypto and traditional assets.

Is XRP a Good Investment in 2026? Why Is It Stuck at $1.45

XRP is up 6.7% this week, but exchange reserves remain high. Is a volatility spike imminent? We analyze price trend, ETF inflows, whale activity, and regulatory catalysts to answer: will XRP go up, why is XRP dropping, and is XRP a good investment right now?

TL; DR

What is XRP: XRP is a digital asset built for fast, low-cost international payments. It runs on the XRP Ledger and is used by Ripple for its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. Unlike Bitcoin, XRP settles transactions in 3-5 seconds with near-zero fees.Why is XRP Dropping: XRP is not actively dropping, but it is struggling to rise. On the monthly chart, XRP has seen six consecutive months of decline. Currently, the price faces an additional supply wall at $1.45. About 1.24 billion XRP were bought in that range, and those holders sell when the price approaches, creating selling pressure that prevents a recovery.Will XRP Go Up: Potentially yes. XRP is trading near $1.43 and showing its best weekly performance since September 2025. If the price breaks above the $1.45 resistance, analysts expect a move toward $1.90, supported by strong institutional demand.Is XRP a Good Investment: The answer is not simple. Short-term traders may see opportunity in the coming volatility spike. Long-term investors face a bigger question that depends on one key regulatory event. However, the data reveals a surprising signal that most retail buyers are missing right now. To understand whether XRP is a smart buy or a trap at $1.43, you will need to read the full analysis below.What is XRP? A Digital Asset for Global Settlement

Before analyzing the charts, it is crucial to understand the asset in question. What is XRP? Unlike Bitcoin, which was designed as a decentralized digital gold, XRP operates on the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It was created to facilitate fast, low-cost international payments. Traditional bank transfers take days and incur high fees. XRP transactions settle in 3-5 seconds, costing fractions of a penny.

Ripple, the company associated with XRP, uses this asset for its "On-Demand Liquidity" (ODL) service. Banks and financial institutions use ODL to source liquidity during cross-border transactions without pre-funding accounts. This utility is the primary driver for institutional interest. Recently, the network hit a milestone of over 8 million active wallets, signaling growing usage despite recent price stagnation . Furthermore, Ripple is proactively preparing for the future, releasing a four-stage roadmap to make the XRPL "quantum-resistant," aiming to secure the ledger against future quantum computing threats by 2028 .

XRP Price Analysis: The Battle for $1.45

The XRP price trend over the last month tells a story of exhaustion followed by cautious recovery. On the monthly chart, XRP experienced six consecutive months of decline. However, April shows signs of a bottoming process. Weekly charts reinforce this view: after four weeks of lower closes, the last two weeks have seen small rebounds.

According to data from April 22, 2026, XRP is trading at approximately $1.44. Over the last seven days, XRP has outperformed both Bitcoin and Ethereum, rising 6.7% while the broader market rose only 3.2%. Spot trading volume surged 23% to $3.79 billion, and derivative markets saw $40 billion in futures volume on a single day.

Despite this, the price remains 60% below its July 2025 high of $3.65. The current technical picture shows a "low volatility grind" higher. The 20-day EMA is at $1.3924, and the 50-day EMA is at $1.4119, both acting as support . However, the immediate hurdle is the $1.45 resistance level. This price point has rejected every rally attempt in 2026.

Why is XRP Dropping? And Will XRP Go Up?

The primary reason for the recent "drop" (or lack of upward momentum) is not active selling, but rather the "supply wall." Data indicates that roughly 1.24 billion XRP tokens were purchased by investors in the $1.45 to $1.47 range. These investors have been waiting months to "break even." Every time the price approaches $1.45, these holders sell to exit their positions, creating a massive wall that retail buying cannot easily absorb.

However, the underlying momentum is shifting. Analysts suggest a xrp volatility spike imminent because the absorption capacity of buyers is increasing. Historically, when exchange reserves are high but the price refuses to drop significantly, it signals that buyers are absorbing the supply. The price has held above $1.39 despite the overhang, which is a sign of relative strength.

So, will XRP go up? Yes, potentially. But it needs a catalyst, if the price closes a daily candle above $1.45. If that happens, the next targets are $1.60 to $1.65, and eventually $1.90 .

XRP Exchange Netflow and XRP ETF Netflow: A Tale of Two Markets

The current market dynamic is best understood by looking at two opposing data streams: XRP Exchange netflow and XRP ETF flows.

Exchange Dynamics (Retail / Whales):

Data shows a complex pattern of "large inflows and increasing reserves." Recently, a Ripple-associated wallet moved 75 million XRP (approx. $108 million) to Coinbase. This initially looks like a dump, but context matters. These transfers are likely to provide liquidity for Ripple’s ODL business, not necessarily spot market selling. However, the result is that exchange reserves have climbed to 2.76 billion XRP .

The Good News: While reserves are high, the rate of increase is slowing. Specifically, "whale" transfers to exchanges have dropped 98% from their April 11 peak. The Binance reserve has slightly decreased from 27.7 to 27.6 billion. The aggressive selling from large holders appears to have stopped.

Institutional Dynamics (ETF):

While whales were sending coins to exchanges, institutions were buying XRP ETF products. XRP ETF net flow is strongly positive.

US-listed XRP ETFs recorded four consecutive days of inflows totaling $38.86 million recently .The weekly inflow for mid-April hit $119.6 million, a multi-month high .Cumulative net inflows stand at $12.8 billion, with Assets Under Management (AUM) at roughly $10.8 billion.Analyzing the Divergence: Why Both Flows Are Positive

It seems contradictory that exchange reserves are high (suggesting selling) while ETFs are buying (suggesting buying). However, this phenomenon reveals the current market structure.

Different Investor Profiles: The exchange inflows likely come from short-term traders, market makers, or Ripple itself providing ODL liquidity. These are "hot" coins ready to be sold. The ETF inflows represent "sticky" capital. Institutions buying ETFs are typically long-term holders (LTHs) or asset managers who do not day-trade. They are removing liquidity from the spot market by buying through custodians.The "De-risking" Trade: Sophisticated funds might be engaging in basis trading. They buy the ETF (taking a long position) while simultaneously shorting XRP futures or selling spot inventory to capture the funding rate. This keeps the price stable while volume increases.Absorption: The most likely scenario is that the market is simply absorbing the excess supply. The fact that the price is stable ($1.43) and not collapsing to $1.20 despite 2.76 billion coins sitting on exchanges is a massive win for the bulls. The ETF inflows are acting as a sponge, soaking up the selling pressure from the ODL wallets.The Regulatory Catalyst: The SEC and the CLARITY Act

Fundamentally, the recent price action cannot be separated from regulation. For years, the primary answer was the SEC lawsuit. That narrative is dying.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently praised SEC Chair Paul Atkins as "a breath of fresh air and sanity" . This regulatory thaw is critical. The SEC is reportedly considering dropping the long-standing lawsuit, and five XRP ETF applications are awaiting review.

The major catalyst on the horizon is the CLARITY Act. A Senate markup is expected before the end of April. Standard Chartered analysts project that if the bill advances, it could unlock $4 to $8 billion in institutional flows . Polymarket gives the bill a 60-66% chance of passing in 2026. If the CLARITY Act classifies XRP as a non-security (commodity), the institutional floodgates will open, likely overwhelming the $1.45 supply wall instantly.

Is XRP a Good Investment in 2026?

Given all this data, is XRP a good investment? The answer depends entirely on your risk tolerance and time horizon.

The Bull Case (Why it is a good investment): The risk/reward ratio is asymmetrical to the upside. The price is near multi-year lows relative to its utility. Whale selling has stopped, ETF demand is rising, and the network is expanding (8 million wallets, quantum resistance roadmap). If the CLARITY Act passes, XRP could realistically trade between $1.60 and $1.80 in the short term, with a potential run to $3.00+ if the lawsuit is officially dropped.The Risk Case (Why it is NOT a good investment): There is a clear resistance wall at $1.45. If the CLARITY Act fails or is delayed past May (due to midterm election dynamics), the "buy the rumor, sell the news" dynamic could reverse. If the price fails to break $1.45 and loses support at $1.33, a drop back to $1.15 is technically possible .

Verdict: XRP is a speculative buy for traders looking for a volatility spike. It is a hold for current investors. For new investors, it is only a good investment if you believe in regulatory clarity within the next 30 days. Technically, waiting for a confirmed break above $1.55 (to avoid the fakeout) is safer than buying at $1.43.

FAQ

Q: Will XRP go up if the CLARITY Act passes?

A: Yes, historically. Analysts predict that if the CLARITY Act passes, signaling that XRP is a commodity, it would remove the regulatory overhang. This could trigger a surge in institutional buying, pushing the price from the current $1.43 range to test the $1.80 - $2.00 resistance levels quickly.

Q: Why is XRP dropping when Bitcoin is going up?

A: XRP has specific supply dynamics. Unlike Bitcoin, which has a fixed supply issuance, XRP faces periodic sell-pressure from Ripple's treasury wallets used to fund ODL (liquidity) services. Additionally, the $1.45 "break-even" wall causes XRP to drop relative to BTC when short-term traders exit.

Q: Is a volatility spike imminent for XRP?

A: Yes. The Bollinger Bands on the daily chart are squeezing. The price is stuck between support at $1.33 and resistance at $1.45. Historically, when XRP volume surges 23% in a week (as it did on April 21), it precedes a violent move. The direction depends on whether the $1.45 resistance breaks.

Q: What is the XRP ETF netflow status?

A: As of late April 2026, XRP ETFs are seeing positive netflows. The US ETFs recorded a single week inflow of $119.6 million in mid-April. Cumulative inflows are strong at $12.8 billion, indicating that institutions are accumulating during this dip, which is a long-term bullish signal for price stabilization.

Q: Is XRP a good investment for beginners?

A: XRP is less volatile than "meme coins" but more volatile than Bitcoin. For beginners, it is a moderate-risk investment. Its value is tied to real utility (bank payments). However, beginners should wait to see if the price can close a weekly candle above $1.55 before entering, to avoid buying into the current resistance wall.

Disclaimer: None of the information in this article constitutes, or is intended to constitute, investment advice. Trading cryptocurrencies carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Always do your own research.

About WEEX

Founded in 2018, WEEX has developed into a global crypto exchange with over 6.2 million users across more than 150 countries. The platform emphasizes security, liquidity, and usability, providing over 1,200 spot trading pairs and offering up to 400x leverage in crypto futures trading. In addition to the traditional spot and derivatives markets, WEEX is expanding rapidly in the AI era — delivering real-time AI news, empowering users with AI trading tools, and exploring innovative trade-to-earn models that make intelligent trading more accessible to everyone. Its 1,000 BTC Protection Fund further strengthens asset safety and transparency, while features such as copy trading and advanced trading tools allow users to follow professional traders and experience a more efficient, intelligent trading journey.

Follow WEEX on social media

X: @WEEX_Official 

Instagram: @WEEX Exchange 

Tiktok: @weex_global 

Youtube: @WEEX_Official 

Discord: WEEX Community 

Telegram: WeexGlobal Group

FC Barcelona vs Celta Vigo: Can Anyone Stop Barcelona at Home?

FC Barcelona vs Celta Vigo lineups, standings, and stats for April 22, 2026. FC Barcelona need a win to stay on track for the La Liga title. Full preview inside.

Carl Moon & WEEX Head to Mugello: The Crypto Trader's Ferrari Challenge

Forget the sidelines. WEEX is hitting the 300km/h mark at Mugello this weekend. Witness Carl Moon’s transformation from a supermarket cashier to a Ferrari racer, and discover why the world’s fastest trading floor belongs on the world’s most technical track at the official Ferrari Challenge.

How to Become a Pro Crypto Trader: WEEX Interview with Ferrari Racer Carl Moon

Ferrari racer Carl Moon on mastering crypto trading: 80/20 rule, AI tools, Bitcoin at $95K, and risk lessons from the track.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more